Surgeons operating under theatre lights
Home / Procedures / Lower eyelid and eye bags / Transconjunctival blepharoplasty

Transconjunctival blepharoplasty

Transconjunctival blepharoplasty removes or repositions lower eyelid fat through an incision on the inside of the lid, leaving no visible skin scar. It suits patients whose main problem is bulging fat rather than excess skin, since the incision itself removes no skin.

What it treats

  • Tomlinson and Hovey described the transconjunctival approach in 1975 in 7 patients, calling it an excellent operation for patients with prominent lower lid fat who do not need skin resection (PMID 1153547).
  • The approach suits bulging orbital fat without significant skin excess; fat can be resected, or preserved and draped over the rim, or used as a free graft, depending on presentation (PMID 33906758).
  • Dodenhoff extended the indications to patients with fine wrinkles, excess skin and redundant orbicularis muscle by adding a chemical peel, a skin pinch or a canthoplasty to the fat step (PMID 8638486).
  • Jacono and Moskowitz favor the transconjunctival approach for the lower lid because it circumvents the lower eyelid retraction risk associated with the transcutaneous skin-muscle flap (PMID 11518974).

How it is done

  • Baylis reported 122 consecutive transconjunctival cases: no lid retraction or ectropion; the main problem was fat left behind, in 7.4% (PMID 2771349).
  • Netscher compared the transconjunctival and transcutaneous approaches left-right in 10 patients; both were graded the same at 6 months (PMID 7568479).
  • Fat handling options through the transconjunctival incision: excision alone, fat preserved and draped over the orbital rim as a pedicled flap, or fat excised and then free-grafted back (PMID 33906758).
  • Refined orbital fat trimming, 97 patients: fat volume is deliberately trimmed rather than fully preserved, to correct fat herniation and tear trough while avoiding midfacial overfilling from fat-preserving technique (PMID 41137243).
  • Fat handling technique that moves rather than removes the fat, including the orbital rim planes used and the tear trough results, is covered in fat-repositioning-lower-blepharoplasty.md.
  • Skin pinch: a fold of loose lower lid skin is excised without undermining, added to the transconjunctival fat step; 71 patients, mean 8 mm removed (range 4-12 mm), temporary scleral show in 3 (PMID 18434828).
  • Skin pinch did not change lid height: a 0.05 mm difference with or without the pinch, 45 patients (PMID 18209632).
  • Chemical peel adjunct: transconjunctival fat removal combined with trichloroacetic acid and phenol chemoexfoliation in 146 patients, without an external scar (PMID 8826588).
  • Laser adjunct: CO2 laser resurfacing added to transconjunctival blepharoplasty, either immediately or 2 months later, in a randomized trial of 44 subjects (PMID 11237896).
  • Full-field Er:YAG laser resurfacing performed simultaneously with skin pinch lower blepharoplasty, 25 patients, alongside tear trough microfat grafting and blunt orbital retaining ligament release (PMID 42108678).
  • Integrated technique, 248 patients over 4 years: fat excision in 91%, fat transposition in 61%, skin excision in 63%, trichloroacetic acid peel in 62%, temporary tarsorrhaphy in 31%, lateral canthopexy in 18% (PMID 21200234).
  • American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery member survey: transconjunctival approach used by 96% of respondents, transcutaneous by 82% (PMID 28151825).

Results and evidence

  • Postseptal transconjunctival technique, 88 patients: swelling, bruising and chemosis were common and typically resolved within 1-2 weeks; 14 patients had a foreign body sensation resolving in 48-72 hours; average return to social activity was 2 weeks (PMID 39628738).
  • Refined fat trimming series, 97 patients, mean follow-up 8.2 months: mean operative time 56.3 minutes; FACE-Q satisfaction with eyes score 3.63 of 4, with 67.0% "very satisfied" and 29.9% "somewhat satisfied" (PMID 41137243).
  • Randomized trial of CO2 laser timing, 44 subjects: transconjunctival blepharoplasty alone improved lower lid bulging in 92% of subjects, while wrinkling worsened in 46%; adding laser resurfacing gave a statistically significant wrinkle improvement (P<0.0005) regardless of timing; no subject developed lower lid retraction (PMID 11237896).
  • Comparative laser study, 36 patients (20 transconjunctival plus laser, 16 transcutaneous): bulging improved in 92% of the transconjunctival-plus-laser group against 98% of the transcutaneous group (PMID 17510867).
  • Erbium laser plus skin pinch, 25 patients: mean Barton tear trough score improved from 2.88 to 0.52 (P<0.0001); mean MRD2 was unchanged, 3.75 mm against 3.71 mm (P=0.65), indicating lid position was preserved (PMID 42108678).
  • Literature review, 49 studies, 10,698 patients, mean follow-up 14.8 months: pooled reoperation 0.77%, scleral show 0.37%, lid malposition 0.25%, ectropion 0.24% (PMID 30084870).

Risks and complications

  • Transconjunctival blepharoplasty alone, 15 eyes (some with added Erbium laser, TCA peel or fat transposition): MRD2 decreased, meaning the lid elevated, in 73%; scleral show was eliminated in 86% of the eyes that had it; no lid retraction occurred (PMID 26537512).
  • Same comparative laser study: the transcutaneous group had lateral canthal rounding in 3.2% and ectropion in 6.25%, against persistent erythema in 5% and hyperpigmentation in 10% in the transconjunctival-plus-laser group, which also had 80% of patients reporting long postoperative care (PMID 17510867).
  • Cadaver study, 46 hemifaces: the pretarsal motor nerve safe zone for a lower lid muscle incision lies 6.0-6.5 mm below the lid margin, 9.4 mm from the medial canthus line and 3 mm from the lateral canthal crease (PMID 37384881).
  • Randomized trial, CO2 laser against monopolar cautery, 78 patients: the laser group had less chemosis; conjunctival granuloma occurred in 7.89% of the cautery group (PMID 36723988).
  • Persistent chemosis, 1,047 patients: type 3 chemosis was more frequent after transcutaneous surgery with lateral canthoplasty than after transconjunctival surgery, and more frequent with radiofrequency (PMID 38610858).
  • Systematic review, 36 articles: no major complications with visual disturbance were reported for lower eyelid blepharoplasty (PMID 40995580).
  • Review of 24 cohort studies, 2000-2025: both the transconjunctival and transcutaneous incisions are safe for fat-preserving technique; reporting is too weak to name a best approach (PMID 41415593).
  • Retraction repair series without an internal spacer graft, 11 patients, 17 procedures, most with prior lower blepharoplasty: mean improvement in marginal reflex distance was 2.2 mm (range 1.6-2.8 mm), with one mild overcorrection (PMID 27590867).

Recovery

  • Postseptal series, 88 patients: swelling, bruising and chemosis resolved within 1-2 weeks; average return to social activity 2 weeks (PMID 39628738).
  • Refined fat trimming series, 97 patients: transient lower eyelid swelling in all patients resolved within 8 weeks; mild chemosis in 2.1% resolved within 2 weeks; mild bleeding of 0.5 mL or less in 7.2% (PMID 41137243).
  • Combined skin pinch and Er:YAG resurfacing, 25 patients: transient chemosis in 6 patients and prolonged erythema in 2, all resolving with conservative care; no ectropion, retraction, new scleral show or vision-threatening complication (PMID 42108678).
  • Laser resurfacing after transconjunctival blepharoplasty produced complaints of long postoperative care in 80% of one laser-treated group, against a shorter recovery reported for the transcutaneous group in the same comparison (PMID 17510867).

With a facelift

  • Dodenhoff combined transconjunctival fat removal with a chemical peel, a skin pinch excision or a lateral canthoplasty at the same operation (PMID 8638486).
  • Integrated technique series, 248 patients: lateral canthopexy was added in 18% and temporary tarsorrhaphy in 31% (PMID 21200234).
  • Postseptal series, 88 patients: 19 had additional canthoplasty or canthopexy and 87 received fat transfer to correct a negative vector (PMID 39628738).
  • Graded approach to the lower lid: isolated bags may be treated by transconjunctival fat resection alone; mild skin laxity adds a skin pinch; fine lines add a peel or laser; a lid-cheek junction abnormality adds orbicularis retaining ligament release and canthal tightening (PMID 28027251).
  • Fat repositioning and tear trough correction, often combined with the transconjunctival incision, are covered in fat-repositioning-lower-blepharoplasty.md.

Current questions

  • Fat removal against fat preservation through the transconjunctival incision: a 2025 review of 24 studies found reporting too weak to name a best approach (PMID 41415593).
  • Preventing overfilling from fat-preserving technique: a 2025 series added deliberate fat trimming to a preservation-based transconjunctival technique specifically to avoid midfacial bulge (PMID 41137243).
  • Choice of skin adjunct (pinch, peel or laser) is reported by surgeon preference; no trial identified compares the three head to head (PMID 33906758).
  • Laser resurfacing after transconjunctival blepharoplasty trades a longer, more care-intensive recovery for a wrinkle improvement that fat surgery alone does not provide (PMID 17510867; PMID 11237896).
  • Retraction risk after transconjunctival surgery is reported as near zero across current series, in contrast to the retraction risk historically attributed to the transcutaneous skin-muscle flap (PMID 26537512; PMID 11518974).

Terms

  • Transconjunctival approach: incision on the inner surface of the lower lid; no external scar (PMID 1153547).
  • Postseptal plane: the surgical plane entered behind the orbital septum to reach fat directly (PMID 39628738).
  • Skin pinch: excision of a fold of loose lower lid skin without undermining (PMID 18434828).
  • Chemoexfoliation: a trichloroacetic acid or phenol chemical peel applied to lower lid skin (PMID 8826588).
  • CO2/Er:YAG laser resurfacing: ablative laser treatment of lower lid skin for fine wrinkles (PMID 11237896).
  • MRD2: margin reflex distance 2, from the corneal light reflex to the lower lid margin, used to measure lid position (PMID 26537512).
  • Scleral show: white of the eye visible below the iris, a sign of lid retraction (PMID 26537512).
  • Fat preservation: leaving orbital fat in place, or repositioning it, rather than excising it (PMID 33906758).
  • Negative vector: a globe that projects forward of the cheek in profile, a risk factor for lid malposition addressed with fat transfer or canthal support (PMID 39628738).

Papers

PMID First author Year Journal Title Finding
1153547 Tomlinson FB 1975 Plast Reconstr Surg Transconjunctival lower lid blepharoplasty for removal of fat. Originating description, 7 patients (landmark)
2771349 Baylis HI 1989 Ophthalmology Transconjunctival lower eyelid blepharoplasty. Technique and complications. 122 cases: no retraction or ectropion (landmark)
7568479 Netscher DT 1995 Plast Reconstr Surg Transconjunctival versus transcutaneous lower eyelid blepharoplasty: a prospective study. Left-right study, 10 patients: approaches graded equal (landmark)
8638486 Dodenhoff TG 1995 Aesthetic Plast Surg Transconjunctival blepharoplasty: further applications and adjuncts. Adjuncts: peel, pinch, canthoplasty added to fat step
8826588 Gilbert SE 1996 Ann Plast Surg Transconjunctival blepharoplasty with chemoexfoliation. 146 patients: fat removal plus TCA/phenol peel
11518974 Jacono AA 2001 Facial Plast Surg Transconjunctival versus transcutaneous approach in upper and lower blepharoplasty. Review favoring transconjunctival to avoid retraction risk
11237896 Carter SR 2001 Ophthalmology Lower eyelid CO(2) laser rejuvenation: a randomized, prospective clinical study. RCT 44 subjects: laser adds wrinkle improvement, no retraction
17510867 Griffin RY 2007 Orbit Treatment of the lower eyelid with the CO2 laser: transconjunctival or transcutaneous approach? 36 patients: transcutaneous better bulging, more complications
18209632 Taban M 2008 Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg Lower eyelid position after transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty with versus without a skin pinch. Skin pinch does not change lid height (0.05 mm)
18434828 Kim EM 2008 Ann Plast Surg Power of the pinch: pinch lower lid blepharoplasty. 71 patients: mean 8 mm skin removed, pinch technique
21200234 Hidalgo DA 2011 Plast Reconstr Surg An integrated approach to lower blepharoplasty. 248 patients: component technique percentages, 6 revisions
26537512 Segal KL 2016 Aesthetic Plast Surg The Effect of Transconjunctival Blepharoplasty on Margin Reflex Distance 2. 15 eyes: MRD2 decreased in 73%, no retraction
27590867 Taban MR 2017 Aesthet Surg J Lower Eyelid Retraction Surgery Without Internal Spacer Graft. 17 procedures: mean 2.2 mm improvement without graft
28027251 Hashem AM 2017 Plast Reconstr Surg Evidence-Based Medicine: A Graded Approach to Lower Lid Blepharoplasty. Graded strategy from fat resection alone to full ligament release
28151825 Kossler AL 2018 Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg Current Trends in Upper and Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty Among American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Members. Survey: transconjunctival used by 96% of respondents
30084870 Wilson SC 2018 Aesthet Surg J Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Does the Literature Support the Longevity of this Procedure? 49 studies, 10,698 patients: ectropion 0.24%
33906758 Sarhaddi D 2021 Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am Transconjunctival Lower Lid Blepharoplasty with and Without Fat Preservation and Skin Resurfacing. Review: fat and skin adjunct options by presentation
36723988 Chen CF 2023 Plast Reconstr Surg Carbon Dioxide Laser Transconjunctival Lower Blepharoplasty: An Objective and Quantitative Comparison to Monopolar Electrosurgery. RCT 78 patients: CO2 laser gives less chemosis than cautery
37384881 Choi Y 2024 Plast Reconstr Surg Avoiding Pretarsal Denervation in Lower Blepharoplasty Incisions: Refined Pretarsal Motor Nerve Anatomy. Cadaver study: nerve safe zone for lower lid incisions
38610858 Di Maria A 2024 J Clin Med Persistent Conjunctival Chemosis after Lower Lid Blepharoplasty: A Comparison of Different Surgical Techniques. 1,047 patients: chemosis linked to canthoplasty, radiofrequency
39628738 Gupta R 2024 Cureus Exploring the Versatility of Transconjunctival Blepharoplasty: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. 88 patients: postseptal technique, 2-week recovery
40995580 Gimenez AR 2025 Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Safety and Complications in Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty: A Systematic Review. 36 articles: no major vision complications reported
41137243 Li W 2025 Medicine (Baltimore) Refined trimming of orbital fat in transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty: A retrospective cohort study on clinical outcomes and aesthetic assessment. 97 patients: fat trimming avoids overfilling, FACE-Q 3.63
41415593 Atiyeh B 2025 Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Transconjunctival or Transcutaneous Approach for Fat-preserving Lower Lid Blepharoplasty? Review of 24 studies: both incisions safe, reporting weak
42108678 Bair H 2026 J Cosmet Laser Ther Simultaneous skin pinch lower blepharoplasty and full-field Er:YAG laser resurfacing: a novel combined approach for lower eyelid rejuvenation. 25 patients: Barton score improved, MRD2 unchanged

Papers cited on this page

Newest first.

2025
Safety and Complications in Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty: A Systematic Review
Gimenez AR, Rohrich R, Borab Z, Fisher S, Fagien S, Rohrich RJ · Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open · PMID 40995580
2025
Transconjunctival or Transcutaneous Approach for Fat-preserving Lower Lid Blepharoplasty?
Atiyeh B, Chrabieh E, Makkawi K, Beaineh P, Issa O, Emsieh S · Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open · PMID 41415593
2024
Persistent Conjunctival Chemosis after Lower Lid Blepharoplasty: A Comparison of Different Surgical Techniques
Di Maria A, Barone G, Gaeta A, Confalonieri F, Vinciguerra P, Vinci V, et al. · J Clin Med · PMID 38610858
2023
2018
Current Trends in Upper and Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty Among American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Members
Kossler AL, Peng GL, Yoo DB, Azizzadeh B, Massry GG · Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 28151825
2018
Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Does the Literature Support the Longevity of this Procedure?
Wilson SC, Daar DA, Maliha SG, Abdou SA, Levine SM, Baker DC · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 30084870
2017
Evidence-Based Medicine: A Graded Approach to Lower Lid Blepharoplasty
Hashem AM, Couto RA, Waltzman JT, Drake RL, Zins JE · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 28027251
2016
The Effect of Transconjunctival Blepharoplasty on Margin Reflex Distance 2
Segal KL, Patel P, Levine B, Lisman RD, Lelli GJ · Aesthetic Plast Surg · PMID 26537512
2011
An integrated approach to lower blepharoplasty
Hidalgo DA · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 21200234
2008
Power of the pinch: pinch lower lid blepharoplasty
Kim EM, Bucky LP · Ann Plast Surg · PMID 18434828
2001
Lower eyelid CO(2) laser rejuvenation: a randomized, prospective clinical study
Carter SR, Seiff SR, Choo PH, Vallabhanath P · Ophthalmology · Randomized Controlled Trial · PMID 11237896
1995
Transconjunctival versus transcutaneous lower eyelid blepharoplasty: a prospective study
Netscher DT, Patrinely JR, Peltier M, Polsen C, Thornby J · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 7568479