Home / Procedures / Brow lift / Endoscopic brow lift

Endoscopic brow lift

An endoscopic brow lift raises low eyebrows through a few short scalp incisions and a camera, without the ear-to-ear coronal incision, and weakens the frown muscles between the brows. It is used for brow droop and frown lines, and it was the most frequent brow lift technique in American Society of Plastic Surgeons member surveys from 2000 and 2020.

What it treats

  • Brow droop (brow ptosis) usually starts in the outer (lateral) brow; in 20 cadaver heads the lateral brow had less deep support than the inner brow (PMID 8643714).
  • Forces on the lateral brow: frontalis resting tone holds the brow up only medial to the temporal fusion line; lateral to it, soft tissue slides down over the temporalis fascia; the corrugator and lateral orbicularis oculi pull the brow down (PMID 8643714).
  • The brow does not fall evenly with age: women aged 50 to 60 (34) had brows 19.1, 22.4 and 22.4 mm above the medial canthus, pupil and lateral canthus; women aged 20 to 30 (36) had 15.7, 19.8 and 21.3 mm (PMID 19935315).
  • The same study concludes that raising the medial and mid brow does not give a youthful result and that selective lateral lifting does (PMID 19935315).
  • The supraorbital nerve has a superficial division over the frontalis and a deep division running between the galea and the bone covering to the scalp; injury to the deep division causes most scalp numbness after forehead lifts (24 half-heads, 30 volunteers) (PMID 7638280).

How it is done

Origins

  • Vasconez 1994: cadaver studies and 32 patients; corrugators, procerus and frontalis divided or weakened; excess skin taken up by dissecting the scalp back toward the occiput (PMID 7972423).
  • Isse 1994: 61 endoscopic forehead lifts in 11 months, with results comparable to coronal lifts (PMID 8122572).

Standard steps

  • Dissection under the periosteum through three small incisions, release of the periosteum at the upper orbital rims, removal of the glabellar frown muscles, and temporary suspension until the periosteum reattaches; 400 procedures in 393 patients, 1994-2000 (PMID 12409778).
  • A 35-year single-practice account: wide subperiosteal dissection to the zygomatic arch and orbit, cuts through the brow depressor muscles, and lateral suture fixation (PMID 41203333).
  • Three dissection planes are in use (subgaleal, subperiosteal, and combined); they differ in risk to the deep branch of the supraorbital nerve (PMID 42465865).
  • 50 cadaver hemifaces: supraorbital nerve tension limited the lift; nerve slack allowed 2.5 to 5.5 mm (mean 4.1 mm); the galeal fat pad accounted for 60% of brow mobility (PMID 36727814).

Fixation

  • Scoping review, 27 papers, 2,519 patients, 11 fixation methods; most common were sutures (906), bone tunnels (649), Endotine implants (333) and screws (216) (PMID 40804547).
  • 538 patients: brow elevation with sutures through bone tunnels was 6.21 mm at 1 month and 6.16 mm at more than 3 months (mean 9.4 months); with fibrin glue it fell from 5.93 mm to 3.79 mm (PMID 15083028).
  • Percutaneous K-wire fixation, 284 patients (1996-2018): 2 hematomas; 1.8% needed a second one-sided lift (PMID 31361803).
  • 14 cadaver skulls: cortical tunnels drilled at 45 degrees and Mitek anchors never went through the inner skull table; one Endotine post and three miniscrews did (PMID 16977357).

Frown muscles

  • 23 patients followed 12 months: corrugator and procerus removal improved moving frown-line scores more than no removal (2.56 vs 1.07) (PMID 31046060).
  • 312 lifts without frown-muscle removal (2016-2023): brows rose 2-3 mm medially, centrally and laterally in 113 measured cases; complications 0.6%, revisions 1.9% (PMID 40820940).

High or receding hairline

  • Incisions and Endotine anchors placed in forehead creases: brow elevation 2.78 mm medially to 5.05 mm laterally, with forehead length proportion unchanged (PMID 34593745).

Results and evidence

  • Meta-analysis, 12 studies (1994-2024): long-term elevation 3.25 mm medial, 3.86 mm central, 4.35 mm lateral (PMID 39542644).
  • Meta-analysis of all brow lift types, 22 studies, 2,127 brows, weighted mean follow-up 20.9 months: lateral 3.8 mm, central 3.02 mm, medial 2.41 mm (PMID 40788666).
  • Review 2026: the highest long-term elevation in any study did not exceed 5.6 mm; elevation fell gradually over time, and the medial brow was least elevated (PMID 42077543).
  • 650 patients, mean follow-up 7.1 years: satisfaction 96.6 at 6 months and 79.9 at 2 years or more (0-100 scale); reoperation 1.2% (PMID 34269765).
  • 65 patients, mean 6 years: endoscopic and pretrichial open lifts both kept a significant elevation, with no difference between them (PMID 35653546).
  • 50 endoscopic against 22 pretrichial lifts: more early elevation with endoscopic (21% vs 13% change in brow height ratio); long-term retention and complications similar (PMID 41239801).
  • Endoscopic temporal brow lift, 71 patients: mean elevation 1.8 mm at midpupil, 1.9 mm at medial canthus, 1.8 mm at lateral canthus; complications 1.4% (PMID 31764641).
  • Endotine fixation with upper blepharoplasty, 35 patients: mean elevation 1.6 mm, stable up to 55 months (PMID 33631951).
  • 140 patients, one surgeon: endoscopic and coronal/pretrichial lifts gave comparable elevation at 1 year; coronal/pretrichial brow position dropped gradually over 5 years (PMID 11322395).
  • 628 cases, 1997-2001: 70% of patients satisfied, 50% of 21 surveyed surgeons pleased with long-term results; the hospital's endoscopic brow lift volume fell 70% (PMID 12900626).
  • 35 patients analyzed with eyes closed by AI: forehead height did not change; the increase seen with eyes open was attributed to a relaxed frontalis (PMID 42012844).

Risks and complications

  • Systematic review, 82 studies, endoscopic subperiosteal lifts: numbness or tingling (paresthesia) 6.2%, asymmetry 3.6%, hair loss 3.0%, incomplete eye closure 2.7% (PMID 23388642).
  • Systematic review, 76 studies: endoscopic lifts had the highest hair-loss rate of all brow lift types, 2.8% (PMID 30534495).
  • 650 patients: temporary itching 13.7%, headache 6.3%, one-sided facial nerve weakness 5.8%; permanent undercorrection 7.1%, hair loss 4.2%, forehead irregularity 2.3%, surprised look 2.2% (PMID 34269765).
  • 805 cosmetic forehead/eyebrow lifts (open and endoscopic): excessive bleeding during surgery 3.7%, early bleeding after surgery 1.5%, hematoma drainage 0.7%; bleeding more frequent in men (PMID 41870876).
  • Fixation review: neurological complications 11.69%, aesthetic 6.27%, wound 1.19%; bone tunnels had the lowest complication profile and screws the highest (PMID 40804547).
  • Meta-analysis, 13 studies: pooled complication rates under 3% with few exceptions; permanent fixation had more asymmetry, contour irregularity, cysts and corrective surgery than temporary fixation (PMID 41697229).
  • Double vision from superior oblique muscle weakness after endoscopic brow lift, 2 cases, resolved within 3 months (PMID 39746538).
  • Vertical internal brow suspension, 118 cases: suture extrusion 6.8%, temporary hair loss at incisions 5.1% (PMID 39378135).

Recovery

  • Telephone survey, 57 patients: 89% used pain medicine for under 1 week, 95% had swelling for under 2 weeks, 63% had some numbness, 28% noticed hair loss at an incision, 77% rated scars unnoticeable (PMID 23699709).
  • Forehead numbness took a mean 2.3 months to recover in 650 patients (PMID 34269765).
  • 21 prospective and 58 retrospective patients: open lifts left less scalp sensation than endoscopic lifts at 1 to 14 weeks and at 6 to 18 months, with no difference after 18 months; 57 of 58 said numbness would not stop them repeating the surgery (PMID 21079105).
  • Bone-tunnel series: small areas of temporal hair loss recovered in under 3 months; one frontal branch weakness recovered by 4 months (PMID 15083028).
  • The same authors cite experimental evidence that periosteal fixation must hold for at least 6 weeks to be secure (PMID 15083028).
  • 8 of 16 patients with headaches before surgery reported fewer or milder headaches afterward (PMID 23699709).

Combined procedures

  • Kaye 1977 described the forehead lift as an adjunct done alone or with facelift and blepharoplasty (PMID 887657).
  • 400 endoscopic forehead lifts: the complication rate did not markedly increase when combined with other facial procedures (PMID 12409778).
  • 57 patients: those who also had a facelift more often took 2 weeks or longer to return to normal activities; pain medicine use, swelling, numbness, hair loss and satisfaction did not differ from brow lift alone (PMID 23699709).
  • 93 deep-plane facelift patients, including groups with forehead lift and endoscopic forehead lift: result ratings did not correlate with procedure group (PMID 20966814).
  • Frown-muscle study: 19 of 23 patients had the endoscopic brow lift with other procedures to the brow, midface, jowl and neck (PMID 31046060).
  • CosmetAssure database, 6,126 patients: brow lift with blepharoplasty had the same major complication rate as either alone (0.4% combined, 0.4% blepharoplasty, 0.7% brow lift) (PMID 29369102).
  • Upper blepharoplasty at the same operation (214 of 538 patients) did not change long-term brow height (PMID 15083028).

Current questions

  • Durability: pooled long-term elevation of 3.25-4.35 mm (PMID 39542644) against a 2026 review that finds long-term maintenance poor, especially laterally (PMID 42077543).
  • Fixation: a randomized trial of 36 patients found bone tunnels held the brow better than temporary tape at 9 months, with longer operating time (PMID 42441344); a meta-analysis found no difference in revision for lost fixation between permanent and temporary bone fixation (PMID 41697229).
  • Tined implants gave more lateral elevation and more dysesthesia than sutures in pooled data (PMID 40788666).
  • Lateral relapse: vertical internal brow suspension proposed to prevent it (PMID 39378135).
  • Frown-muscle removal: routine myectomy (PMID 31046060) against lifts without it (PMID 40820940).
  • Forehead lengthening: eyes-closed AI analysis reports no true elongation (PMID 42012844).
  • Neuromodulators: frequent use among surveyed surgeons rose from 11.2% to 88.5%, and nearly 30% think they have replaced formal brow lifting to a significant degree (PMID 37409963).
  • Nerve limit: supraorbital nerve tension may cap elevation at 2.5-5.5 mm (PMID 36727814).

Terms

  • Brow ptosis: an eyebrow lower than its youthful position; the lateral segment usually drops first (PMID 8643714).
  • Endoscope: a thin camera passed through small incisions to see and dissect under the scalp (PMID 7972423).
  • Subperiosteal plane: the layer under the periosteum, the membrane covering the skull (PMID 12409778).
  • Periosteal release: cutting the periosteum at the upper orbital rim so the brow can move up (PMID 12409778).
  • Corrugator and procerus: frown muscles between the brows, weakened or removed during the lift (PMID 31046060).
  • Fixation: holding the lifted forehead with bone tunnels, screws, implants such as Endotine, sutures or glue while it heals (PMID 40804547).
  • Deep branch of the supraorbital nerve: sensory nerve to the scalp that runs under the galea; injury causes scalp numbness (PMID 7638280).
  • Temporal fusion line: ridge on the side of the skull where frontalis support of the brow ends (PMID 8643714).
  • Galea aponeurotica: the tough fibrous layer of the scalp (PMID 7638280).
  • Lagophthalmos: incomplete eye closure (PMID 23388642).

Papers

PMID First author Year Journal Title Finding
7972423 Vasconez LO 1994 Plast Reconstr Surg Endoscopic techniques in coronal brow lifting. First endoscopic coronal brow lift series, 32 patients, no coronal incision (landmark)
12900626 Chiu ES 2003 Plast Reconstr Surg Endoscopic brow lift: a retrospective review of 628 consecutive cases over 5 years. 628 cases; 70% of patients satisfied, 50% of surgeons pleased long term; volume fell 70% (landmark)
37409963 Coombs DM 2023 Aesthet Surg J Practice Patterns: An American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) Member Survey, 2000 and 2020-How Much Has Brow Lifting Changed? ASPS survey 2000 vs 2020: endoscopic still most used; neuromodulator use 11.2% to 88.5%
8643714 Knize DM 1996 Plast Reconstr Surg An anatomically based study of the mechanism of eyebrow ptosis. Lateral brow drops first; less deep support lateral to temporal fusion line (landmark)
19935315 Matros E 2009 Plast Reconstr Surg Changes in eyebrow position and shape with aging. Brows sit higher in women aged 50-60 than 20-30; favors lateral lift (landmark)
7638280 Knize DM 1995 Plast Reconstr Surg A study of the supraorbital nerve. Deep division of supraorbital nerve causes most scalp numbness after forehead lift (landmark)
8122572 Isse NG 1994 Aesthetic Plast Surg Endoscopic facial rejuvenation: endoforehead, the functional lift. Case reports. Endoforehead: 61 cases, results comparable to coronal lift (landmark)
12409778 De Cordier BC 2002 Plast Reconstr Surg Endoscopic forehead lift: review of technique, cases, and complications. 400 endoscopic forehead lifts; technique and complications (landmark)
41203333 Cahill G 2026 Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am Endoscopic Brow Lifting: A 35-Year Experience and Lessons Learned. 35-year experience: wide subperiosteal release, myotomies, lateral suture fixation
42465865 Zhou B 2026 Front Surg Anatomy-guided dissection plane selection in endoscopic brow lift: a narrative review of supraperiosteal, subperiosteal, and multiplane approaches. Review of subgaleal, subperiosteal and multiplane dissection planes
36727814 Kim SH 2023 Plast Reconstr Surg How the Lifting Amount of Endoscopic Brow Lifts Is Influenced by Supraorbital Nerve Tension and Brow Gliding-Layer Mobility. 50 cadaver hemifaces: supraorbital nerve tension limits lift to 2.5-5.5 mm
40804547 Caceres H 2025 Aesthetic Plast Surg Fixation Techniques Across Endoscopic Brow Lifts: A Scoping Review. Scoping review 2,519 patients, 11 fixation methods; bone tunnels fewest complications
15083028 Jones BM 2004 Plast Reconstr Surg Endoscopic brow lift: a personal review of 538 patients and comparison of fixation techniques. 538 patients: bone tunnels stable (6.16 mm), fibrin glue relapsed (3.79 mm) (landmark)
31361803 Chasan PE 2020 Aesthet Surg J The K-Wire Fixation Technique for Endoscopic Brow Lift: A Long-Term Follow-Up. K-wire fixation, 284 patients, 1.8% second unilateral lift
16977357 Walden JL 2006 Aesthetic Plast Surg Current methods for brow fixation: are they safe? Cadaver skull thickness: screws and one Endotine post penetrated inner table
31046060 Starkman SJ 2019 JAMA Facial Plast Surg Association of Corrugator Supercilii and Procerus Myectomy With Endoscopic Browlift Outcomes. Corrugator/procerus myectomy improved dynamic glabellar lines, 23 patients
40820940 Liu RH 2026 Laryngoscope Short-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Brow Lifting Without Depressor Resection. 312 lifts without depressor resection: 2-3 mm rise, 0.6% complications
34593745 Boonipat T 2022 J Craniofac Surg Endoscopic Browlift in Patients With Receding Hairlines. Receding hairline: forehead-crease incisions, 2.78-5.05 mm lift, forehead length unchanged
39542644 Şibar S 2025 Aesthet Surg J Long-term Stability in Endoscopic Brow Lift: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Meta-analysis 12 studies: long-term elevation 3.25-4.35 mm
40788666 Karanfilian T 2026 Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg Long-Term Brow Lift Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Meta-analysis 2,127 brows: 2.41-3.8 mm at 20.9 months; tined implants more dysesthesia
42077543 Atiyeh BS 2026 Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Forehead Eyebrow Lift Techniques: Review of the Literature and Critical Appraisal of Long-term Efficacy. Review: long-term elevation never above 5.6 mm, gradual loss
34269765 Kashkouli MB 2022 Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg Short- and Long-term Patient Satisfaction and Complications in 650 Endoscopic Forehead Lift Procedures. 650 patients, 7.1-year follow-up: satisfaction 96.6 to 79.9; reoperation 1.2%
35653546 Aslan Gülbitti H 2022 Plast Reconstr Surg Long-Term Evaluation of Endoscopic and Pretrichial Open Forehead Lifts: A Morphometric Analysis. Endoscopic and pretrichial lifts equal at mean 6 years, 65 patients
41239801 Garg N 2026 Laryngoscope A Comparison of Brow Elevation and Complications: Endoscopic Versus Pretrichial Brow Lift. Endoscopic 50 vs pretrichial 22: more early lift endoscopic, equal long term
31764641 Rohrich RJ 2019 Plast Reconstr Surg Endoscopic Temporal Brow Lift: Surgical Indications, Technique, and 10-Year Outcome Analysis. Endoscopic temporal brow lift, 71 patients, 1.8 mm lift, 1.4% complications
33631951 Perez PB 2021 Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Investigating Long-Term Brow Stabilization by Endotine-Assisted Endoscopic Brow Lift with Concomitant Upper Lid Blepharoplasty. Endotine with blepharoplasty: 1.6 mm lift, stable to 55 months
11322395 Dayan SH 2001 Aesthetic Plast Surg The forehead lift: endoscopic versus coronal approaches. Endoscopic and coronal lifts comparable at 1 year, 140 patients
42012844 Xu L 2026 Plast Reconstr Surg Understanding Perceived Forehead Changes Post-Endoscopic Brow Lift: The Impact of Frontalis Muscle Contraction. Eyes-closed AI analysis: forehead does not lengthen after endoscopic lift
23388642 Byun S 2013 Aesthet Surg J Complications of browlift techniques: a systematic review. Systematic review 82 studies: endoscopic paresthesia 6.2%, alopecia 3.0%
30534495 Cho MJ 2018 Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Complications in Brow Lifts: A Systemic Review of Surgical and Nonsurgical Brow Rejuvenations. Systematic review 76 studies: endoscopic highest alopecia rate, 2.8%
41870876 Dugan SE 2026 Orbit Incidence and management of bleeding and hematoma in 805 cosmetic forehead/eyebrow lift procedures: an oculofacial plastic surgeon's experience. 805 forehead/brow lifts: hematoma drainage 0.7%, bleeding more in men
41697229 Graf AE 2026 Plast Reconstr Surg "Endoscopic-assisted, subperiosteal browlift bone fixation technique outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Meta-analysis: permanent vs temporary bone fixation, same revision for loss of fixation
39746538 Eshraghi B 2025 J AAPOS Superior oblique paresis following endoscopic brow lift. Superior oblique paresis after endoscopic brow lift, 2 cases, resolved
39378135 Bitik O 2025 Aesthet Surg J Vertical Internal Brow Suspension: A Technique to Avoid Lateral Relapse After Endoscopic Brow Lift. Vertical internal brow suspension, 118 cases, to prevent lateral relapse
23699709 Panella NJ 2013 JAMA Facial Plast Surg Patient outcomes, satisfaction, and improvement in headaches after endoscopic brow-lift. 57 patients: 89% analgesics under 1 week; facelift patients slower return to activity
21079105 Guillot JM 2011 Arch Facial Plast Surg Forehead and scalp sensation after brow-lift: a comparison between open and endoscopic techniques. Open vs endoscopic: open lifts reduce scalp sensation longer; equal after 18 months
887657 Kaye BL 1977 Plast Reconstr Surg The forehead lift: a useful adjunct to face lift and blepharoplasty. Forehead lift as adjunct to facelift and blepharoplasty (landmark)
20966814 Swanson E 2011 Plast Reconstr Surg Outcome analysis in 93 facial rejuvenation patients treated with a deep-plane face lift. 93 deep-plane facelift patients incl. forehead lift groups: ratings not tied to procedure group
29369102 Wormer BA 2023 Ann Plast Surg Does Brow Lift Add Risk to Blepharoplasty? Answers From a Multicenter Analysis of 6126 Patients Undergoing Aesthetic Eye Surgery. CosmetAssure 6,126 patients: brow lift plus blepharoplasty adds no major complication risk
42441344 Haddady-Abianeh S 2026 World J Plast Surg Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques for Endoscopic Brow Lift: Bone Tunnel Fixation Versus Temporary Tape Fixation: A Clinical Trial. Randomized trial, 36 patients: bone tunnel beats temporary tape at 9 months

Papers cited on this page

Newest first.

2026
Endoscopic Brow Lifting: A 35-Year Experience and Lessons Learned
Cahill G, Gidumal S, Nabili V, Keller GS · Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am · PMID 41203333
2026
Short-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Brow Lifting Without Depressor Resection
Liu RH, Kim M, Lindsay RW · Laryngoscope · PMID 40820940
2026
Long-Term Brow Lift Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Karanfilian T, Zong AM, Delbourgo Patton C, Gupta L, Barmettler A · Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg · Systematic Review · PMID 40788666
2026
Forehead Eyebrow Lift Techniques: Review of the Literature and Critical Appraisal of Long-term Efficacy
Atiyeh BS, Chrabieh EE, Daoud FJ, Issa OB, Emsieh SE, Ghaddar HH, et al. · Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open · PMID 42077543
2026
A Comparison of Brow Elevation and Complications: Endoscopic Versus Pretrichial Brow Lift
Garg N, Alnemri A, DeKloe J, Baldari A, Bheemreddy A, Agarwal A, et al. · Laryngoscope · PMID 41239801
2026
Understanding Perceived Forehead Changes Post-Endoscopic Brow Lift: The Impact of Frontalis Muscle Contraction
Xu L, Huang H, Lee EI, Song SH, Ahn TJ, Most SP · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 42012844
2026
Incidence and management of bleeding and hematoma in 805 cosmetic forehead/eyebrow lift procedures: an oculofacial plastic surgeon's experience
Dugan SE, Feist JE, Clark JD, Compton CJ, Carvalho Soares Valentim C, Kashkouli MB · Orbit · PMID 41870876
2026
"Endoscopic-assisted, subperiosteal browlift bone fixation technique outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis"
Graf AE, Kang JM, Ferzli G, Rosenfeld RM, Romo T · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 41697229
2026
Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques for Endoscopic Brow Lift: Bone Tunnel Fixation Versus Temporary Tape Fixation: A Clinical Trial
Haddady-Abianeh S, Rahmati J, Yavari A, Delavari C, Taghipour Arani M, Molaei H · World J Plast Surg · PMID 42441344
2025
Fixation Techniques Across Endoscopic Brow Lifts: A Scoping Review
Caceres H, Raza SN, Katta T, Savage A, Anderson L, Barker S, et al. · Aesthetic Plast Surg · PMID 40804547
2025
Long-term Stability in Endoscopic Brow Lift: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature
Şibar S, Dikmen AU, Erdal AI · Aesthet Surg J · Systematic Review · PMID 39542644
2025
Superior oblique paresis following endoscopic brow lift
Eshraghi B, Aghajani A · J AAPOS · PMID 39746538
2023
Does Brow Lift Add Risk to Blepharoplasty? Answers From a Multicenter Analysis of 6126 Patients Undergoing Aesthetic Eye Surgery
Wormer BA, Rankin TM, Kaoutzanis C, Al Kassis S, Gupta V, Grotting JC, et al. · Ann Plast Surg · PMID 29369102
2023
Practice Patterns: An American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) Member Survey, 2000 and 2020-How Much Has Brow Lifting Changed?
Coombs DM, Sinclair NR, Kochuba A, Grow J, Couto RA, Matarasso A, et al. · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 37409963
2022
Endoscopic Browlift in Patients With Receding Hairlines
Boonipat T, Hebel N, Lin J, Frank K, Möllhoff N, Cotofana S, et al. · J Craniofac Surg · PMID 34593745
2022
Short- and Long-term Patient Satisfaction and Complications in 650 Endoscopic Forehead Lift Procedures
Kashkouli MB, Abdolalizadeh P, Mansour S, Hamami P, Karimi N, Khademi B · Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 34269765
2022
Long-Term Evaluation of Endoscopic and Pretrichial Open Forehead Lifts: A Morphometric Analysis
Aslan Gülbitti H, Stakelbeek C, van der Lei B · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 35653546
2021
Investigating Long-Term Brow Stabilization by Endotine-Assisted Endoscopic Brow Lift with Concomitant Upper Lid Blepharoplasty
Perez PB, Gunter AE, Moody MP, Vincent AG, Perez CR, Serra RM, et al. · Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol · PMID 33631951
2020
The K-Wire Fixation Technique for Endoscopic Brow Lift: A Long-Term Follow-Up
Chasan PE, Hauch AT · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 31361803
2019
Association of Corrugator Supercilii and Procerus Myectomy With Endoscopic Browlift Outcomes
Starkman SJ, Sherris DA · JAMA Facial Plast Surg · PMID 31046060
2018
Complications in Brow Lifts: A Systemic Review of Surgical and Nonsurgical Brow Rejuvenations
Cho MJ, Carboy JA, Rohrich RJ · Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open · PMID 30534495
2013
Complications of browlift techniques: a systematic review
Byun S, Mukovozov I, Farrokhyar F, Thoma A · Aesthet Surg J · Systematic Review · PMID 23388642
2013
Patient outcomes, satisfaction, and improvement in headaches after endoscopic brow-lift
Panella NJ, Wallin JL, Goldman ND · JAMA Facial Plast Surg · PMID 23699709
2011
Forehead and scalp sensation after brow-lift: a comparison between open and endoscopic techniques
Guillot JM, Rousso DE, Replogle W · Arch Facial Plast Surg · PMID 21079105
2009
Changes in eyebrow position and shape with aging
Matros E, Garcia JA, Yaremchuk MJ · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 19935315
2006
Current methods for brow fixation: are they safe?
Walden JL, Orseck MJ, Aston SJ · Aesthetic Plast Surg · PMID 16977357
2003
Endoscopic brow lift: a retrospective review of 628 consecutive cases over 5 years
Chiu ES, Baker DC · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 12900626
2002
Endoscopic forehead lift: review of technique, cases, and complications
De Cordier BC, de la Torre JI, Al-Hakeem MS, Rosenberg LZ, Gardner PM, Costa-Ferreira A, et al. · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 12409778
2001
The forehead lift: endoscopic versus coronal approaches
Dayan SH, Perkins SW, Vartanian AJ, Wiesman IM · Aesthetic Plast Surg · PMID 11322395
1996
An anatomically based study of the mechanism of eyebrow ptosis
Knize DM · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 8643714
1995
A study of the supraorbital nerve
Knize DM · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 7638280
1994