Home / Procedures / Lower eyelid and eye bags / Lower blepharoplasty

Lower blepharoplasty

Lower blepharoplasty treats bags under the eyes by removing or repositioning the orbital fat that bulges below the eye, and by removing excess skin when present. It is done mainly for appearance, for adults who see bags or circles under the eyes, a tired look or a flattened face.

What it treats

  • Aging of the lower lid includes excess skin, orbital fat herniation, tear trough hollowing and midface descent; weakening of the lid's supporting structures lets the fat pads prolapse (review of 54 anatomic studies) (PMID 39585706).
  • The lower lid has a less favorable complication profile than the upper lid (PMID 39585706).
  • The aging contour is both fat prolapse and cheek descent, which exposes the orbital rim and deepens the tear trough (PMID 10697189).
  • Removing lower lid fat can leave a concave contour, the "operated" look (PMID 7624408).
  • Members of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery reported an average of 46 lower lid and 53 four-lid blepharoplasties a year each (161 respondents) (PMID 28151825).

How it is done

Approach

  • Transconjunctival: the incision is inside the lid; in 122 consecutive cases there was no lid retraction or ectropion, and the main problem was fat left behind in 7.4% (PMID 2771349).
  • Transcutaneous (subciliary): the incision is below the lashes and a skin-muscle flap is raised; in a 10-patient left-right study both approaches graded the same at 6 months (PMID 7568479).
  • Skin pinch: loose skin is excised without undermining; 71 patients, temporary scleral show in 3; in 25 measured patients a mean 8 mm of skin was removed (range 4-12 mm) (PMID 18434828).
  • Lid height moved 0.05 mm after transconjunctival surgery with or without a skin pinch, 45 patients (PMID 18209632).
  • Surgeon survey: transconjunctival approach used by 96%, transcutaneous by 82%; fat excision 99%, fat repositioning 80%, lateral canthal suspension 96% (PMID 28151825).

Fat excision or fat repositioning

  • Arcus marginalis release: Hamra released the septum at the orbital rim and advanced the lower lid fat over the rim, 152 cases over 3 years (PMID 7624408).
  • Transconjunctival fat repositioning: medial and central fat pedicles moved into a subperiosteal pocket on the maxilla, 24 patients followed 6-30 months; some variable resorption (PMID 10697189).
  • Septal reset: the orbital septum itself is reset over the rim, which gives the lid a firmer undersurface than fat transposition alone (PMID 15253208).
  • Five-step technique, 100 lids in 50 patients: deep malar fat augmented, orbicularis preserved, minimal or no fat removed, orbicularis retaining ligament released, lateral canthus supported, minimal skin removed; no lower lid malposition (PMID 21278622).
  • Fat removal followed by grafting the removed fat, 229 patients: 97.8% satisfied (PMID 30418468).
  • Minced free fat graft (69) against pedicle fat flap (73): no significant difference in complications or satisfaction; reoperation 5.8% against 12.3% (p=0.2) (PMID 37463504).
  • Deep fat excision with septum-fat flap transposition, transcutaneous, 107 patients: 91.6% complete correction of bags and tear trough, 8.4% undercorrection (PMID 41051496).
  • Transcutaneous technique with a capsulopalpebral fascia incision and selective omission of canthoplasty, 340 patients: no ectropion or other major complication (PMID 40952103).

Instruments and anatomy

  • CO2 laser against monopolar cautery, randomized, 78 patients: less chemosis with the laser; conjunctival granuloma in 3 (7.89%) of the cautery group (PMID 36723988).
  • Pretarsal nerve safe zone, 46 cadaver hemifaces: the zone for the muscle incision lies 6.0-6.5 mm below the lid margin, 9.4 mm from the medial canthus line and 3 mm from the lateral canthal crease; incising there preserves the nerve supply and prevents pretarsal atrophy (PMID 37384881).

Results and evidence

  • Literature review 1997-2017, 49 studies, 10,698 patients: pooled reoperation 0.77%, scleral show 0.37%, lid malposition 0.25%, ectropion 0.24%; mean follow-up 14.8 months (PMID 30084870).
  • In that review, photographs beyond 24 months existed for 10 patients (0.094%) (PMID 30084870).
  • Randomized trial, 50 patients, traditional lower blepharoplasty against fat transposition, both with canthopexy: 96% improvement on photographs; self-esteem scores improved at 6 months (PMID 22124642).
  • Extended transconjunctival blepharoplasty with ligament release and free fat grafts, 200 consecutive patients, mean follow-up 22 months: no scleral show; fat necrosis 3.5%; revision 1.0% (PMID 41150997).
  • Transcutaneous blepharoplasty with orbicularis suspension, 78 patients, at least 12 months: malposition (29.5%) and scleral show (28.2%) unchanged from before surgery; no ectropion; revision 1.3%; 98.7% satisfied (PMID 41677016).
  • Negative preoperative canthal tilt was associated with scleral show in the same series (PMID 41677016).
  • Deep fat excision series: FACE-Q lower eyelid score improved from 66.7 to 21.9; patients perceived a 3.3-year age reduction (PMID 41051496).
  • Review of 24 cohort studies (2000-2025): fat excision or transposition is safe through either incision; transposition is probably easier through the skin; the literature lacks rigorous outcome reporting (PMID 41415593).
  • Systematic review, 36 articles: no major complications with visual disturbance reported; most complications resolved with conservative care or revision (PMID 40995580).

Risks and complications

  • Conventional lower blepharoplasty with fat removal through the septum carries a reported potential lower lid malposition rate of 15%-20% (PMID 18434828).
  • Repair of lower lid retraction after blepharoplasty, 30 patients: success depended on time since surgery, globe prominence and septal or skin involvement (PMID 1390423).
  • Subtle retraction and eversion after skin pinch or laser resurfacing were detected by MRD2 at the lateral limbus and by tarsal margin show, not by standard MRD2, and were prevented by lateral canthal resuspension (PMID 31444052).
  • Fat grafting and repositioning for tear trough or lid-cheek junction, 33 studies, 4,671 patients: total complications 11.2%, contour irregularity or undercorrection 6.2%, hematoma, swelling or bruising 6.2%, reoperation 2.4% (PMID 39158343).
  • Strabismus, IRIS Registry, 368,623 patients: 3-year incidence of strabismus diagnosis 2.0% after lower against 1.5% after upper blepharoplasty; strabismus surgery 0.15% against 0.06% (PMID 38346431).
  • Chemosis, 1,047 patients: persistent type 3 chemosis was more frequent after transcutaneous surgery with lateral canthoplasty than after transconjunctival surgery, and more frequent with radiofrequency (PMID 38610858).
  • Orbital hemorrhage after cosmetic eyelid surgery: 0.055%; permanent visual loss 0.0045% (PMID 15599241).
  • Scarring review, 3,650 patients: hypertrophic scar in 36; no keloid reported after cosmetic eyelid surgery (PMID 36797842).
  • Ectropion prevention review, 16 studies: Frost sutures, periosteal anchoring, barbed sutures and splinting were used; evidence quality low; one study found no benefit from Frost sutures (PMID 40907566).

Recovery

  • Subcutaneous tranexamic acid in eyelid surgery including lower blepharoplasty, 130 patients randomized by side: less bruising on day 0 and at 1 week; 69% of patients reporting saw less bruising on the treated side; no change in bleeding during surgery (PMID 38624153).
  • Botulinum toxin into the lateral orbicularis at closure, 40 Asian patients randomized: narrower subciliary scars; scar scale scores the same (PMID 34128526).
  • Repositioned fat: the fixation suture comes out after 3-5 days; texture and contour settle over 1-2 months (PMID 10697189).
  • Edema occurred in 5 and pronounced chemosis in 2 of the patients who had orbicularis suspension, canthopexy or canthoplasty with a pinch blepharoplasty (PMID 18434828).
  • Orbital hemorrhage is most likely in the first 3 hours after surgery (PMID 15599241).

Combined procedures

  • Hamra performed arcus marginalis release with fat preservation in all composite rhytidectomies, and in isolated blepharoplasty for patients without advanced facial aging (PMID 7624408).
  • The septal reset was added to composite rhytidectomy after orbicularis repositioning and fat transposition (PMID 15253208).
  • TOPS database, 13,346 facelifts: blepharoplasty was the most common added procedure; combined procedures raised the odds of adverse events (PMID 32459769).
  • Midface lift through a skin-muscle flap, 130 patients: tear trough volume increased whether fat was left alone, repositioned or removed; mean follow-up 12 months (PMID 36719989).
  • Transconjunctival deep-plane midface lift, 124 patients, median follow-up 56 months: no significant complications; patients with heavy excess skin or festoons were advised traditional techniques (PMID 22859542).
  • Facelift approach can be chosen by midface ptosis grade, with transconjunctival blepharoplasty plus skin pinch or fat transposition as the lower lid options (PMID 33657627).
  • Blending the lid-cheek junction: 22 studies of fat conservation, fat augmentation, fat repositioning, ligament release, septal reset and deep cheek filler (PMID 29787515).

Current questions

  • Approach for fat preservation: both incisions are safe; a 2025 review found outcome and complication reporting too weak to name a best approach (PMID 41415593).
  • Pedicle transposition or free fat graft: equal outcomes in a 142-patient comparison (PMID 37463504); free grafts from removed fat in 200 patients gave 3.5% fat necrosis (PMID 41150997).
  • Routine or selective canthal support: a 340-patient series omitted canthoplasty selectively without ectropion (PMID 40952103); canthal surgery was linked to persistent chemosis (PMID 38610858); routine canthopexy maintained canthal position in 104 patients (PMID 31985628).
  • Durability: long-term photographic follow-up is rare (PMID 30084870).
  • Strabismus after lower blepharoplasty is more frequent than after upper blepharoplasty in registry data (PMID 38346431).

Terms

  • Transconjunctival approach: incision on the inner surface of the lower lid, no skin scar (PMID 2771349).
  • Transcutaneous (subciliary) approach: incision just below the lashes with a skin-muscle flap (PMID 7568479).
  • Skin pinch: removal of a fold of loose lid skin without undermining (PMID 18434828).
  • Arcus marginalis: the attachment of the orbital septum at the bony rim, released to move fat over the rim (PMID 7624408).
  • Fat repositioning (transposition): moving orbital fat on its pedicle over the rim instead of removing it (PMID 10697189).
  • Septal reset: advancing the orbital septum over the rim to smooth the lid-cheek junction (PMID 15253208).
  • Orbicularis retaining ligament: the ligament that tethers the lid-cheek junction; released in some techniques (PMID 21278622).
  • Scleral show: white of the eye visible between iris and lower lid (PMID 41677016).
  • Ectropion: outward turning of the lower lid (PMID 40907566).
  • Chemosis: swelling of the conjunctiva (PMID 38610858).
  • MRD2: distance from the corneal light reflex to the lower lid margin (PMID 18209632).

Papers

PMID First author Year Journal Title Finding
37531619 Nahai F 2023 Aesthet Surg J An Overview of Surgical Approaches for Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty. Overview of approaches; lower blepharoplasty is mainly aesthetic
39585706 Memon SF 2025 J Craniofac Surg Lower Eyelid Surgical Anatomy and the Implications for Blepharoplasty Surgery: A Systematic Review of Anatomic Studies in the Literature. Systematic review of 54 anatomic studies of the lower lid
10697189 Goldberg RA 2000 Plast Reconstr Surg Transconjunctival orbital fat repositioning: transposition of orbital fat pedicles into a subperiosteal pocket. Fat pedicles moved to a subperiosteal pocket, 24 patients (landmark)
7624408 Hamra ST 1995 Plast Reconstr Surg Arcus marginalis release and orbital fat preservation in midface rejuvenation. Arcus marginalis release and fat preservation, 152 cases (landmark)
15253208 Hamra ST 2004 Plast Reconstr Surg The role of the septal reset in creating a youthful eyelid-cheek complex in facial rejuvenation. Septal reset in composite rhytidectomy (landmark)
2771349 Baylis HI 1989 Ophthalmology Transconjunctival lower eyelid blepharoplasty. Technique and complications. 122 transconjunctival cases: no retraction or ectropion (landmark)
7568479 Netscher DT 1995 Plast Reconstr Surg Transconjunctival versus transcutaneous lower eyelid blepharoplasty: a prospective study. Left-right study, 10 patients: transconjunctival equal to transcutaneous (landmark)
18434828 Kim EM 2008 Ann Plast Surg Power of the pinch: pinch lower lid blepharoplasty. Pinch blepharoplasty, 71 patients, mean 8 mm skin removed
18209632 Taban M 2008 Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg Lower eyelid position after transconjunctival lower blepharoplasty with versus without a skin pinch. Skin pinch does not change lid height (0.05 mm)
28151825 Kossler AL 2018 Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg Current Trends in Upper and Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty Among American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Members. ASOPRS survey: 80% reposition fat, 96% suspend the canthus
21278622 Rohrich RJ 2011 Plast Reconstr Surg The five-step lower blepharoplasty: blending the eyelid-cheek junction. Five-step lower blepharoplasty, 100 lids, no malposition
30418468 Kim HS 2019 JAMA Facial Plast Surg Effectiveness of Transconjunctival Fat Removal and Resected Fat Grafting for Lower Eye Bag and Tear Trough Deformity. 229 patients: fat removal plus fat grafting, 97.8% satisfied
37463504 Karimi N 2023 Aesthet Surg J Minced Free Fat Graft Versus Pedicle Fat Flap to Efface Orbital Rim Hollow in Lower Blepharoplasty. 142 patients: minced fat graft equal to pedicle flap
41051496 Chen J 2026 Plast Reconstr Surg Fat Repositioning with Deep Fat Excision in Transcutaneous Lower Blepharoplasty. 107 patients: deep fat excision plus septum-fat flap, 91.6% full correction
40952103 Nomoto S 2026 Plast Reconstr Surg Subtarsal Capsulopalpebral Fascia Incision: A New Paradigm for Ectropion-Free Transcutaneous Lower Blepharoplasty. 340 patients: capsulopalpebral fascia incision, no ectropion
36723988 Chen CF 2023 Plast Reconstr Surg Carbon Dioxide Laser Transconjunctival Lower Blepharoplasty: An Objective and Quantitative Comparison to Monopolar Electrosurgery. RCT 78 patients: CO2 laser gives less chemosis than cautery
37384881 Choi Y 2024 Plast Reconstr Surg Avoiding Pretarsal Denervation in Lower Blepharoplasty Incisions: Refined Pretarsal Motor Nerve Anatomy. Cadaver study: nerve safe zone for lower lid incisions
30084870 Wilson SC 2018 Aesthet Surg J Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Does the Literature Support the Longevity of this Procedure? 49 studies, 10,698 patients: ectropion 0.24%; little long-term photo evidence
22124642 Viana GA 2011 Rev Col Bras Cir Clinical outcomes, patients' satisfaction and aesthetic results after lower eyelid blepharoplasty. RCT 50 patients: fat excision and fat transposition both effective
41150997 Wong CH 2026 Plast Reconstr Surg Long-Term Results with the Extended Transconjunctival Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty: A Prospective Study of 200 Consecutive Cases. 200 extended transconjunctival cases: no scleral show, fat necrosis 3.5%
41677016 Espinosa-Reyes JA 2026 Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med Assessment of Eyelid Positioning with the Transcutaneous Lower Blepharoplasty Surgical Approach: A Single-Surgeon Experience. 78 transcutaneous cases: no ectropion, revision 1.3%
41415593 Atiyeh B 2025 Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Transconjunctival or Transcutaneous Approach for Fat-preserving Lower Lid Blepharoplasty? Review of 24 studies: both incisions safe for fat preservation
40995580 Gimenez AR 2025 Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Safety and Complications in Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty: A Systematic Review. Systematic review of 36 articles: low complication profile
1390423 Baylis HI 1992 Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg Lower eyelid retraction following blepharoplasty. 30 patients: repair of lower lid retraction after blepharoplasty (landmark)
31444052 Harounian J 2019 J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Subtle Eyelid Retraction after Lower Blepharoplasty. Subtle retraction after anterior lamellar work; canthal resuspension prevents it
39158343 Xu Z 2024 Ann Plast Surg Complications of Fat Grafting and Repositioning for Correction of Lower Eyelid Pouch With Tear Trough Deformity or Lid-Cheek Junction: A Systematic Review. Meta-analysis 4,671 patients: fat grafting/repositioning complications 11.2%
38346431 Oke I 2024 Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg The Incidence of Strabismus After Upper and Lower Blepharoplasty in the United States. IRIS 368,623 patients: strabismus more frequent after lower blepharoplasty
38610858 Di Maria A 2024 J Clin Med Persistent Conjunctival Chemosis after Lower Lid Blepharoplasty: A Comparison of Different Surgical Techniques. 1,047 patients: persistent chemosis linked to canthoplasty and radiofrequency
15599241 Hass AN 2004 Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg Incidence of postblepharoplasty orbital hemorrhage and associated visual loss. Orbital hemorrhage 0.055%, permanent visual loss 0.0045% (landmark)
36797842 Anderson L 2023 Aesthet Surg J Evaluation of the Risk of Hypertrophic Scarring and Keloid Following Eyelid Procedures: A Systematic Review. Systematic review: no keloid after cosmetic eyelid surgery
40907566 Yalcin CE 2026 Facial Plast Surg Holding the Lid: Suspension Techniques to Prevent Lower Eyelid Ectropion-A Systematic Review. Systematic review of ectropion-prevention suspension; low-quality evidence
38624153 Paramo R 2024 Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg Effect of Tranexamic Acid on Intra- and Postoperative Bleeding in Eyelid Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Masked, Control Trial. RCT 130 patients: subcutaneous TXA reduces bruising
34128526 Huang YL 2021 Aesthet Surg J Botulinum Toxin to Improve Lower Blepharoplasty Scar: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Clinical Trial. RCT 40 patients: botulinum toxin narrows subciliary scars
32459769 Chopan M 2020 Plast Reconstr Surg Contemporary Analysis of Rhytidectomy Using the Tracking Operations and Outcomes for Plastic Surgeons Database with 13,346 Patients. TOPS 13,346 facelifts: blepharoplasty most common added procedure
36719989 Limongi RM 2023 Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med Three-Dimensional Analysis of Tear Trough Volume After Lower Blepharoplasty with Midface Lift. 130 midface lifts: tear trough volume gain regardless of fat handling
22859542 Seitz IA 2012 Aesthet Surg J The transconjunctival deep-plane midface lift: a 9-year experience working under the muscle. 124 transconjunctival deep-plane midface lifts, median 56 months
33657627 Quatela VC 2021 Facial Plast Surg The Selection of Facelift Approach on the Basis of Midfacial Ptosis. Facelift choice by midface ptosis grade, with lower lid options
29787515 Rohrich RJ 2018 Plast Reconstr Surg The Evolving Role of Blending of the Lid-Cheek Junction in Lower Blepharoplasty. Review of 22 studies on blending the lid-cheek junction
31985628 Rohrich RJ 2020 Plast Reconstr Surg Preventing Lateral Canthal Malposition in Modern Blepharoplasty. 104 patients: lateral retinacular canthopexy maintains canthal position

Papers cited on this page

Newest first.

2026
Fat Repositioning with Deep Fat Excision in Transcutaneous Lower Blepharoplasty
Chen J, Li C, Zhang F, Wu Y, Wang Y, Li Q, et al. · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 41051496
2026
Assessment of Eyelid Positioning with the Transcutaneous Lower Blepharoplasty Surgical Approach: A Single-Surgeon Experience
Espinosa-Reyes JA, Ochoa Alvarez JC, Cobo-Sefair R, Heredia-Combariza N, Henao F, Zamora C · Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med · PMID 41677016
2026
Holding the Lid: Suspension Techniques to Prevent Lower Eyelid Ectropion-A Systematic Review
Yalcin CE · Facial Plast Surg · Systematic Review · PMID 40907566
2025
Transconjunctival or Transcutaneous Approach for Fat-preserving Lower Lid Blepharoplasty?
Atiyeh B, Chrabieh E, Makkawi K, Beaineh P, Issa O, Emsieh S · Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open · PMID 41415593
2025
Safety and Complications in Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty: A Systematic Review
Gimenez AR, Rohrich R, Borab Z, Fisher S, Fagien S, Rohrich RJ · Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open · PMID 40995580
2024
The Incidence of Strabismus After Upper and Lower Blepharoplasty in the United States
Oke I, Elze T, Miller JW, Lorch AC, Hunter DG, Freitag SK, et al. · Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 38346431
2024
Persistent Conjunctival Chemosis after Lower Lid Blepharoplasty: A Comparison of Different Surgical Techniques
Di Maria A, Barone G, Gaeta A, Confalonieri F, Vinciguerra P, Vinci V, et al. · J Clin Med · PMID 38610858
2024
Effect of Tranexamic Acid on Intra- and Postoperative Bleeding in Eyelid Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Masked, Control Trial
Paramo R, Cheng T, Malik A, Fan J, Barmettler A · Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg · Randomized Controlled Trial · PMID 38624153
2023
Minced Free Fat Graft Versus Pedicle Fat Flap to Efface Orbital Rim Hollow in Lower Blepharoplasty
Karimi N, Kashkouli MB, Enayatollahi S, Ghahvehchian H, Abdolalizadeh P, Ramadan M · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 37463504
2023
2023
Evaluation of the Risk of Hypertrophic Scarring and Keloid Following Eyelid Procedures: A Systematic Review
Anderson L, Vankawala J, Gupta N, Dorfman R, Pflibsen L, Vardanian A, et al. · Aesthet Surg J · Systematic Review · PMID 36797842
2023
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Tear Trough Volume After Lower Blepharoplasty with Midface Lift
Limongi RM, Figueiredo MN, Tao JP · Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med · PMID 36719989
2023
An Overview of Surgical Approaches for Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty
Nahai F, Niazi F, Nahai F, Niazi S, Foster JA, Doroodgar F, et al. · Aesthet Surg J · Systematic Review · PMID 37531619
2021
Botulinum Toxin to Improve Lower Blepharoplasty Scar: A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled Clinical Trial
Huang YL, Wallace CG, Hsiao YC, Lee MC, Huang JJ, Chang FC, et al. · Aesthet Surg J · Randomized Controlled Trial · PMID 34128526
2021
The Selection of Facelift Approach on the Basis of Midfacial Ptosis
Quatela VC, Ahmedli NN · Facial Plast Surg · PMID 33657627
2020
Preventing Lateral Canthal Malposition in Modern Blepharoplasty
Rohrich RJ, Mohan R · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 31985628
2019
Subtle Eyelid Retraction after Lower Blepharoplasty
Harounian J, Wulc AE, Brackup AB, Ramesh S · J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg · PMID 31444052
2018
Current Trends in Upper and Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty Among American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Members
Kossler AL, Peng GL, Yoo DB, Azizzadeh B, Massry GG · Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 28151825
2018
Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty: Does the Literature Support the Longevity of this Procedure?
Wilson SC, Daar DA, Maliha SG, Abdou SA, Levine SM, Baker DC · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 30084870
2018
2011
The five-step lower blepharoplasty: blending the eyelid-cheek junction
Rohrich RJ, Ghavami A, Mojallal A · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 21278622
2011
Clinical outcomes, patients' satisfaction and aesthetic results after lower eyelid blepharoplasty
Viana GA, Osaki MH, Nishi M · Rev Col Bras Cir · Randomized Controlled Trial · PMID 22124642
2008
Power of the pinch: pinch lower lid blepharoplasty
Kim EM, Bucky LP · Ann Plast Surg · PMID 18434828
2004
Incidence of postblepharoplasty orbital hemorrhage and associated visual loss
Hass AN, Penne RB, Stefanyszyn MA, Flanagan JC · Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 15599241
1995
Transconjunctival versus transcutaneous lower eyelid blepharoplasty: a prospective study
Netscher DT, Patrinely JR, Peltier M, Polsen C, Thornby J · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 7568479
1992
Lower eyelid retraction following blepharoplasty
Baylis HI, Nelson ER, Goldberg RA · Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 1390423