Operating theatre lights over a surgical team
Home / Procedures / Lower eyelid and eye bags / Tear trough and lid-cheek junction surgery

Tear trough and lid-cheek junction surgery

Tear trough surgery smooths the groove between the lower eyelid and the cheek by releasing the ligament that tethers it and filling it with the patient's own fat, either moved on its blood supply from the eye bag or grafted. It is used mainly for moderate to severe grooves; filler suits mild grooves with good skin, little lid laxity and little fat bulging.

What it treats

  • Loeb named the concavity the "nasojugal groove" in 1961 and Flowers named it the "tear trough" in 1969; under-eye dark circles are an early sign of periorbital aging (PMID 20124855).
  • Definition: the depression of the medial lower lid just lateral to the anterior lacrimal crest, bounded below by the orbital rim; the tear trough rating scale showed little variation between observers (PMID 18047604).
  • Twelve cadaver dissections: under the tear trough the orbicularis muscle attaches directly to bone; under the lid-cheek junction it attaches through the orbicularis retaining ligament (PMID 19337101).
  • The same study found skin and fat atrophy the most likely cause, found descent unlikely because the structures are fixed to bone, and found that bulging orbital fat accentuates the groove (PMID 19337101).
  • Forty-eight hemifaces: a true osteocutaneous tear trough ligament runs from the medial canthal tendon to about the medial pupil line, then continues laterally as the orbicularis retaining ligament (PMID 22634656).
  • The prezygomatic space below the lid is bounded above by the orbicularis retaining ligament and below by the zygomatic ligaments; facial nerve branches to the orbicularis run in its walls, not across it (PMID 12172155).
  • Micro-CT of 12 cadavers: the orbicularis retaining ligament is a main septum on the rim plus many fibrous septa; their skin insertions match the tear trough and the lid-cheek groove (PMID 35139056).
  • 3D photography of 53 women: lying down filled the tear trough by a mean 0.22 mL; the authors attributed midface aging in this cohort mainly to tissue descent (PMID 31974554).

How it is done

Fat transposition

  • Arcus marginalis release: the septum is released at the rim and the lid fat is advanced over the rim under the orbicularis, 152 cases (PMID 7624408).
  • Transconjunctival fat repositioning: medial and central fat pedicles are moved into a subperiosteal pocket and held with an external suture, 24 patients (PMID 10697189).
  • Septal reset: the orbital septum is advanced over the rim, giving a firmer undersurface than fat transposition alone (PMID 15253208).
  • Literature review, 50 papers: almost all authors release the tear trough ligament and add volume; most move fat into a subperiosteal or preperiosteal pocket; internal and external fixation are both used (PMID 36456652).

Ligament release

  • Extended transconjunctival blepharoplasty, 54 patients: the orbicularis origins and tear trough ligament are released medially and the orbicularis retaining ligament laterally, and excised fat is grafted under the released ligament; revision 2%; no chemosis, retraction or ectropion at a mean 10 months (PMID 28746272).
  • Internal fixation of the fat pedicle to the midcheek through the premaxillary and prezygomatic spaces, 22 patients aged 22-39: no hematoma, ectropion or numbness at a mean 11.8 months (PMID 37010464).
  • Tear trough ligament reset against conventional eye bag surgery, 60 patients: better tear trough rating scores (4.82 against 5.92) and higher satisfaction (25 of 30 against 18 of 30) at 6 months (PMID 36513526).

Fat grafting

  • Fractionated fat injected at the lid-cheek junction during lower blepharoplasty: complications no different from regular fat; no fat nodules (PMID 29878987).
  • Minced orbital fat grafts during transconjunctival blepharoplasty, 98 patients: mean tear trough grade fell from 3.11 to 0.87; 78.5% rated the result excellent or good (PMID 38720103).
  • Cannula release of the tear trough ligament with fat injection, 152 patients: satisfaction 93.4% at 1 month and 82.4% at 24 months; investigator-rated improvement 94.1% and 71.8% (PMID 35857083).

Results and evidence

Surgery

  • Fat repositioning after ligament release, 232 patients: the groove was eliminated in more than 85%; patients describing a moderately or extremely severe groove fell from 86.3% to 34.0% (PMID 37220233).
  • Results in 34 patients who had fat removed at an earlier blepharoplasty were comparable to primary cases; the authors require a palpable fat pad (PMID 37220233).
  • Supraperiosteal fat repositioning with midface lift, 1,152 Asian patients (2,304 eyes), mean follow-up 10 months: revision for residual lateral fat 0.7%; 78% extremely satisfied and 19.1% satisfied (PMID 38353810).
  • Extended transconjunctival technique, 200 consecutive patients, mean 22 months: no scleral show; fat necrosis 3.5%; revision 1.0% (PMID 41150997).
  • 3D volume after fat repositioning, 10 patients, mean 12 months: mean gain 0.64 mL in the tear trough and upper cheek (PMID 26847158).
  • Fat repositioning with septal reset (51 patients) against fat injection (50): no improvement in 4 of 102 against 7 of 100 eyes; repositioning gave greater improvement in grade II and III grooves (PMID 28008460).
  • Pedicle fat flap (73) against minced free fat graft (69): no significant difference in complications, satisfaction or reoperation; no residual tear trough deformity in either group (PMID 37463504).
  • Fat grafting meta-analysis, 20 studies, 2,372 patients: pooled satisfaction 94.9% for standard fat grafts; complications 10.1% for standard grafts and 1.5% for stromal vascular fraction (PMID 39658665).

Filler compared (the nonsurgical alternative)

  • Hyaluronic acid meta-analysis, 31 reports, 2,556 patients: satisfaction 91.0%; swelling 19.2%, bruising 18.4%, lumps 5.3%, blue discoloration (Tyndall effect) 0.9% (PMID 37684413).
  • Filler review, 23 articles: effect lasted 8-12 months (PMID 34192769).
  • Delayed filler complications, 52 cases: mean onset 16.8 months; swelling 42.3%, lumps or nodules 25.0% (PMID 34666405).
  • Filler-related deformity corrected with hyaluronidase, filler excision, ligament release and fat transposition, 22 patients: 90.9% satisfied (PMID 38727846).
  • Hyaluronidase before lower blepharoplasty, 23 patients with filler problems: 82.6% had an acceptable outcome without complications; mild malar edema persisted in some (PMID 30298348).
  • Narrative review of 20 studies: fat repositioning lasts longer but carries surgical risk; hyaluronic acid filler needs periodic maintenance (PMID 39590588).

Risks and complications

  • Fat grafting and repositioning, meta-analysis of 33 studies, 4,671 patients: total complications 11.2%; undercorrection or contour irregularity 6.2%; hematoma, swelling or bruising 6.2%; reoperation 2.4% (PMID 39158343).
  • Orbicularis retaining ligament release, 53 patients: no added aesthetic benefit; longer swelling and chemosis and a higher likelihood of ectropion (PMID 28445185).
  • Undercorrection in 30 of 232 patients; transient conjunctival bleeding in 12, lid numbness in 2 and dry eye in 6, all resolved (PMID 37220233).
  • Eye movement, 18 eyelids: vertical and horizontal movement worsened at 3 months after fat repositioning and returned to baseline by 6 months (PMID 34260464).
  • Lower lid ectropion treated with lateral tarsal strip in 7 (0.6%) of the 1,152-patient series; no facial numbness, paralysis, new double vision or granuloma (PMID 38353810).
  • Most common complications after fat grafting: skin wrinkles, undercorrection and induration (PMID 39658665).

Recovery

  • The external fixation suture for repositioned fat is removed after 3-5 days; fat texture and contour settle over 1-2 months (PMID 10697189).
  • Temporary swelling and lumpiness were the most common problems after ligament release with fat injection (PMID 35857083).
  • Swelling and chemosis last longer when the orbicularis retaining ligament is released (PMID 28445185).
  • Eye movement changes seen at 3 months after fat repositioning had resolved by 6 months (PMID 34260464).
  • After earlier filler, 4 of 23 patients had prolonged edema after blepharoplasty; 3 resolved by 6 months (PMID 30298348).

Combined procedures

  • Hamra performed arcus marginalis release with fat preservation in all composite rhytidectomies (PMID 7624408), and added the septal reset to the composite rhytidectomy (PMID 15253208).
  • Midface lift through a skin-muscle flap, 130 patients: tear trough volume rose whether orbital fat was left, moved or removed (PMID 36719989).
  • Endoscopic fat grafting to the tear trough during midface lift, 32 patients: groove eliminated in all; grafts stable at 12 months (PMID 40341978).
  • Endoscopic brow and midface lift, 300 patients including deep tear troughs: no postoperative lower lid retraction; volume filling and skin resurfacing were the most common revisions (PMID 22929253).
  • The volume restored by repositioning facial fat is comparable to the volume typically injected (PMID 31974554).

Current questions

  • Cause of the groove: cadaver work points to atrophy with fixed ligaments (PMID 19337101); 3D positional data point to descent (PMID 31974554).
  • Transposition or grafting: repositioning beat injection for deeper grooves in one comparison (PMID 28008460); pedicle flaps and minced grafts were equal in another (PMID 37463504).
  • Ligament release: one comparative series found more morbidity without aesthetic gain (PMID 28445185); series releasing the tear trough ligament report low complication rates (PMID 41150997).
  • Durability of fat injection: satisfaction fell from 93.4% to 82.4% over 24 months (PMID 35857083).
  • Evidence quality: no single technique can be named best across patients (PMID 36456652).

Terms

  • Tear trough: the groove at the inner lower lid, next to the nose (PMID 18047604).
  • Lid-cheek junction: the lateral continuation of the groove where lid meets cheek (PMID 19337101).
  • Tear trough ligament: the bone-to-skin ligament that creates the tear trough (PMID 22634656).
  • Orbicularis retaining ligament: the ligament along the orbital rim under the lid-cheek junction (PMID 35139056).
  • Arcus marginalis: the septum's attachment at the rim, released to move fat (PMID 7624408).
  • Fat transposition (repositioning): moving orbital fat on its pedicle over the rim (PMID 10697189).
  • Septal reset: advancing the orbital septum over the rim (PMID 15253208).
  • Minced (free) fat graft: small pieces of the removed eye-bag fat placed in the groove (PMID 38720103).
  • Stromal vascular fraction (SVF): a processed fat fraction rich in non-fat cells used for grafting (PMID 39658665).
  • Tear trough rating scale: a graded score of groove severity (PMID 18047604).
  • Hyaluronidase: enzyme that dissolves hyaluronic acid filler (PMID 30298348).

Papers

PMID First author Year Journal Title Finding
36456652 Atiyeh B 2023 Aesthetic Plast Surg Surgical Correction of Tear Trough Deformity (TTD) with Orbicularis Retaining Ligament Release and Volume Augmentation for Periorbital Rejuvenation: Review of the Literature. Review of 50 papers: ligament release plus volume is the consensus
42150047 Termanini KM 2026 Aesthet Surg J Tear Trough Deformity: Update on Anatomy and Clinical Management. 2026 review: surgery for moderate-severe grooves, filler for mild
20124855 Hirmand H 2010 Plast Reconstr Surg Anatomy and nonsurgical correction of the tear trough deformity. Anatomy and history of the tear trough; hyaluronic acid correction (landmark)
18047604 Sadick NS 2007 J Cosmet Dermatol Definition of the tear trough and the tear trough rating scale. Definition of the tear trough and the tear trough rating scale (landmark)
19337101 Haddock NT 2009 Plast Reconstr Surg The tear trough and lid/cheek junction: anatomy and implications for surgical correction. Cadaver anatomy: orbicularis fixed to bone at the tear trough (landmark)
22634656 Wong CH 2012 Plast Reconstr Surg The tear trough ligament: anatomical basis for the tear trough deformity. 48 hemifaces: tear trough ligament identified (landmark)
12172155 Mendelson BC 2002 Plast Reconstr Surg Surgical anatomy of the midcheek and malar mounds. Prezygomatic space and orbicularis retaining ligament (landmark)
35139056 Chen S 2022 Plast Reconstr Surg Anatomical Characterization of the Tear Trough and the Lid-Cheek Junction: An Iodine Staining Technique Based on High-Resolution Micro-Computed Tomography. Micro-CT: ligament-fascia system defines the grooves
31974554 Ramesh S 2021 Aesthet Surg J Gravity in Midfacial Aging: A 3-Dimensional Study. 3D study of 53 women: descent drives midface aging
7624408 Hamra ST 1995 Plast Reconstr Surg Arcus marginalis release and orbital fat preservation in midface rejuvenation. Arcus marginalis release, 152 cases (landmark)
10697189 Goldberg RA 2000 Plast Reconstr Surg Transconjunctival orbital fat repositioning: transposition of orbital fat pedicles into a subperiosteal pocket. Subperiosteal fat repositioning, 24 patients (landmark)
15253208 Hamra ST 2004 Plast Reconstr Surg The role of the septal reset in creating a youthful eyelid-cheek complex in facial rejuvenation. Septal reset (landmark)
28746272 Wong CH 2017 Plast Reconstr Surg Extended Transconjunctival Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty with Release of the Tear Trough Ligament and Fat Redistribution. Extended transconjunctival blepharoplasty, 54 patients, revision 2%
37010464 Gu J 2024 Plast Reconstr Surg Internal Fixation of Redistributed Orbital Fat in Transconjunctival Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty. Internal fixation of repositioned fat, 22 patients, no ectropion
36513526 Zhou M 2023 Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg Tear trough ligament reset as a new method for tear trough deformity and dark circles correction. Ligament reset beats conventional surgery, 60 patients
29878987 Rohrich RJ 2018 Plast Reconstr Surg Role of Fractionated Fat in Blending the Lid-Cheek Junction. Fractionated fat at the lid-cheek junction: no nodules
38720103 Heirati A 2024 Aesthetic Plast Surg Correction of Tear Trough Deformity with Minced Orbital Fat Grafts During Transconjunctival Lower Blepharoplasty. Minced orbital fat grafts, 98 patients, grade 3.11 to 0.87
35857083 Huang R 2022 Aesthetic Plast Surg Tear Trough Ligament Release and Autologous Fat Injection as a New Method for Tear Trough Deformity Correction. Ligament release with fat injection, 152 patients: satisfaction 82.4% at 24 months
37220233 Chen J 2024 Plast Reconstr Surg Transconjunctival Fat Repositioning Blepharoplasty: Is Excess Fat Herniation a Prerequisite? 232 patients: groove eliminated in over 85% even without excess fat
38353810 Cheng AM 2024 Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Supraperiosteal fat repositioning with midface lift in lower eyelid blepharoplasty: an 18-year experience. 1,152 Asian patients: supraperiosteal repositioning with midface lift
41150997 Wong CH 2026 Plast Reconstr Surg Long-Term Results with the Extended Transconjunctival Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty: A Prospective Study of 200 Consecutive Cases. 200 patients: fat necrosis 3.5%, revision 1.0%
26847158 Miller TR 2016 JAMA Facial Plast Surg Long-term 3-Dimensional Volume Assessment After Fat Repositioning Lower Blepharoplasty. 3D volume gain 0.64 mL after fat repositioning
28008460 Chiu CY 2017 Aesthetic Plast Surg Treatment of Tear Trough Deformity: Fat Repositioning versus Autologous Fat Grafting. Repositioning beats fat injection for grade II-III grooves, 101 patients
37463504 Karimi N 2023 Aesthet Surg J Minced Free Fat Graft Versus Pedicle Fat Flap to Efface Orbital Rim Hollow in Lower Blepharoplasty. Minced graft equal to pedicle flap, 142 patients
39658665 Li X 2025 Aesthetic Plast Surg Efficacy and Safety of Stromal Vascular Fraction in the Treatment of Tear Trough Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Meta-analysis 2,372 patients: fat graft complications 10.1%, SVF 1.5%
39158343 Xu Z 2024 Ann Plast Surg Complications of Fat Grafting and Repositioning for Correction of Lower Eyelid Pouch With Tear Trough Deformity or Lid-Cheek Junction: A Systematic Review. Meta-analysis 4,671 patients: complications 11.2%, reoperation 2.4%
28445185 Chan NJ 2018 Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg Orbicularis Retaining Ligament Release in Lower Blepharoplasty: Assessing Efficacy and Complications. ORL release: no aesthetic gain, more ectropion and chemosis
34260464 Kokubo K 2022 J Craniofac Surg Effects of Fat Repositioning for Tear Trough Deformity on Eye Movement. Eye movement worse at 3 months, normal by 6 after fat repositioning
36719989 Limongi RM 2023 Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med Three-Dimensional Analysis of Tear Trough Volume After Lower Blepharoplasty with Midface Lift. Midface lift raises tear trough volume regardless of fat handling
40341978 Askeroglu U 2025 Aesthetic Plast Surg Endoscopic Tear Trough Correction with Fat Graft During Mid-face Lift. Endoscopic fat grafting during midface lift, 32 patients
22929253 Trussler AP 2012 Plast Reconstr Surg Endoscopic management of the difficult lower eyelid: a review of 300 cases. 300 endoscopic brow-midface lifts: no lower lid retraction
37684413 Liu X 2024 Aesthetic Plast Surg The Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Injection in Tear Trough Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. HA filler meta-analysis 2,556 patients: satisfaction 91.0%
34192769 Trinh LN 2022 Facial Plast Surg Dermal Fillers for Tear Trough Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review. Filler systematic review: effect lasts 8-12 months
34666405 Trinh LN 2022 Facial Plast Surg Delayed Complications following Dermal Filler for Tear Trough Augmentation: A Systematic Review. Delayed filler complications, mean onset 16.8 months
38727846 Kang Y 2024 Aesthetic Plast Surg Static and Dynamic Filler-Associated Tear Trough Deformities: Manifestations and Treatment Algorithm. Surgery for filler-related tear trough deformity, 22 patients
30298348 Zoumalan CI 2019 Aesthetic Plast Surg Managing Periocular Filler-Related Syndrome Prior to Lower Blepharoplasty. Hyaluronidase before blepharoplasty, 23 patients
39590588 Christodoulou S 2024 J Pers Med Surgical and Non-Surgical Approach for Tear Trough Correction: Fat Repositioning Versus Hyaluronic Acid Fillers. Review: fat repositioning versus HA filler

Papers cited on this page

Newest first.

2026
Tear Trough Deformity: Update on Anatomy and Clinical Management
Termanini KM, Alghoul MS · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 42150047
2025
Efficacy and Safety of Stromal Vascular Fraction in the Treatment of Tear Trough Deformity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Li X, Yao J, Liu Y, Liu Y, He C, Xue Y · Aesthetic Plast Surg · Systematic Review · PMID 39658665
2025
Endoscopic Tear Trough Correction with Fat Graft During Mid-face Lift
Askeroglu U, Ceran F, Pilanci O · Aesthetic Plast Surg · PMID 40341978
2024
Supraperiosteal fat repositioning with midface lift in lower eyelid blepharoplasty: an 18-year experience
Cheng AM, Chuang AY, Wei YH, Sibia SS, Liao SL · Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol · PMID 38353810
2024
2024
Static and Dynamic Filler-Associated Tear Trough Deformities: Manifestations and Treatment Algorithm
Kang Y, Wang S, Xia Z, Zhang X, Yu N, Liu Z, et al. · Aesthetic Plast Surg · PMID 38727846
2023
Tear trough ligament reset as a new method for tear trough deformity and dark circles correction
Zhou M, Cui L, Jin S, Chen L, Ran J · Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg · PMID 36513526
2023
Minced Free Fat Graft Versus Pedicle Fat Flap to Efface Orbital Rim Hollow in Lower Blepharoplasty
Karimi N, Kashkouli MB, Enayatollahi S, Ghahvehchian H, Abdolalizadeh P, Ramadan M · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 37463504
2023
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Tear Trough Volume After Lower Blepharoplasty with Midface Lift
Limongi RM, Figueiredo MN, Tao JP · Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med · PMID 36719989
2022
Dermal Fillers for Tear Trough Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review
Trinh LN, Grond SE, Gupta A · Facial Plast Surg · Systematic Review · PMID 34192769
2022
Delayed Complications following Dermal Filler for Tear Trough Augmentation: A Systematic Review
Trinh LN, McGuigan KC, Gupta A · Facial Plast Surg · Systematic Review · PMID 34666405
2022
Effects of Fat Repositioning for Tear Trough Deformity on Eye Movement
Kokubo K, Katori N, Hayashi K, Fujii A, Kitamura S, Haga S, et al. · J Craniofac Surg · PMID 34260464
2021
Gravity in Midfacial Aging: A 3-Dimensional Study
Ramesh S, Johnson P, Sarcu D, Wulc AE · Aesthet Surg J · PMID 31974554
2018
Role of Fractionated Fat in Blending the Lid-Cheek Junction
Rohrich RJ, Mahedia M, Shah N, Afrooz P, Vishvanath L, Gupta RK · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 29878987
2018
Orbicularis Retaining Ligament Release in Lower Blepharoplasty: Assessing Efficacy and Complications
Chan NJ, Nazemzadeh M, Hartstein ME, Holds JB, Massry GG, Wulc AE · Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 28445185
2012
The tear trough ligament: anatomical basis for the tear trough deformity
Wong CH, Hsieh MKH, Mendelson B · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 22634656
2012
Endoscopic management of the difficult lower eyelid: a review of 300 cases
Trussler AP, Schaub TA, Byrd HS · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 22929253
2010
Anatomy and nonsurgical correction of the tear trough deformity
Hirmand H · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 20124855
2009
The tear trough and lid/cheek junction: anatomy and implications for surgical correction
Haddock NT, Saadeh PB, Boutros S, Thorne CH · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 19337101
2007
Definition of the tear trough and the tear trough rating scale
Sadick NS, Bosniak SL, Cantisano-Zilkha M, Glavas IP, Roy D · J Cosmet Dermatol · PMID 18047604
2002
Surgical anatomy of the midcheek and malar mounds
Mendelson BC, Muzaffar AR, Adams WP · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 12172155